Main Content

Graham Ellis - my blog

Best use of public transport - Melksham


What will help people make better (appropriate) use of public transport?

Jump down to the Melksham ticket machine "scam"
Jump down to my journey observations and lessons
Jump down to my conclusion as to what might be done

Information - cost - connectivity - comfort - frequency - reliability - all so well illustrated yesterday.

Lets's start with cost - but you will see every element came in here during journey from home in Melksham, England to my destinations (Mill Hill and Clapton) in London, and my return later in the day

From Chris Hinchcliff MP (Labour, new intake 2024) on Facebook

Rail fares in the UK are away too high.

This is spot on from We Own It.

The broken privatised system is ripping off passengers getting on at Letchworth, Baldock, Ashwell, Royston, Bayford, Watton-at-Stone.

Public ownership must mean more affordable journeys that's why I've tabled an amendment to the Rail Bill to create a GB Rail Card that delivers cheaper fares for everyone across the country.


I have long advocated railcard available for all (or indeed a public transport card) - a loyalty card works for you if you are NOT young, NOT old, NOT ex forces, NOT disabled, NOT a resident of Cornwall, NOT travelling with a child etc; that headline £55 per 100 miles dropping with a loyalty card to £36 which will encourage more sustainable use of public transport.


I was in the South East (London area) yesterday, travelling around by public transport. For sure it was busy - at times over-busy - but there was no need to plan ahead during the day. There is a whole different mentality. Looking at the way the price of diesel has rocketed in recent days - an opportunity, perchance, to suggest people don't drive but take the bus or train. Yes, I am aware that many buses and many trains need that same fuel and have the costs which need to be met, but the fuel cost per occupied seat could be so much less than the car fuel cost per occupied seat?

We are fortunate to have an electric car, and solar panel, such that we refuel our car virtually extra cost-free. It doesn't make motoring free - we still have insurance, we now have road tax, we have maintenance and MOT, we may have parking changes or the hidden cost of parking in higher prices for goods we buy at a shop with parking. And if we drive, we are often stuck in the traffic whereas bus lanes and railway lines where they exist help us slice through the journey and make in quickly.

What holds us back from public transport? Matters of cost, reliability, frequency, connectivity, information, comfort and safety. ... let's see how those line up from Melksham for my trip

Yesterday (Saturday 14.3.2026) , I was offered a £94.90 standard off peak return to London from the ticket machine at Melksham Station. Bit overpriced? "Popular destination" for sure, but not a popular price. I preferred the £79.60 super off peak travel card - £15 cheaper and valid on any train "via Swindon" - which every connection is on a Saturday. And that ticket provides unlimited use of Transport for London underground, rail and bus services in London for the day too. Still looking at the price - I have a railcard in one of the privileged groups and that brought my fare down to £53. No extras to pay as I visited Clapton and Mill Hill (which would have together been an extra £12.80 / Tfl farecap), as well as old stomping grounds around The Angel, Islington.

I paid £53. Without a railcard I would have paid £79.60. Buying from the ticket machine front panel, I would have ended up paying £107.70 and no-one there to ask.

As a side issue, the ticket machine at Melksham Station was also offering on its front panel of "Popular Destinations" a day return to Trowbridge at £14.40 "Standard off peak day return". Why?

That is a ripoff - it's my belief that a day return for the journey - 10 minutes each way on any direct train except the 06:29 on Mondays to Fridays - is available at £5.80; price rises to £6.10 if you want to use the 06:29. The £14.40 fare, as far as I can make out, allows to to travel via Chippenham and Bath Spa with changes at both - and would rise to £18.30 for the first three Monday to Friday options - 06:29, 07:21 and 08:02. I would normally pay £5.80, or £3.80 with my railcard and very few people to my knowledge need the option of the long way.

To the right - from the brfares website

Let's take a further look at yesterday

Information - cost - connectivity - comfort - frequency - reliability - all so well illustrated

I set off in the morning at 07:10 - the bus outside my home to the stop nearest to the station. The bus driver has a trainee with him and was commenting on the route - "the railway station is there" he said "it's crazy that we don't stop here". Indeed it is.

The bus dropped me off at 07:24 - not really a "connection" into the train at 08:02; I pottered back along the main road, relieved that I still have my senses and mobility to be able to cross the road without a formal crossing, lots of traffic, awkward curbs. Got to the area of the station at about 07:35. Next bus - on a Saturday not until after the train has left - next train not until 10:02. I could have quicker walked from home, which my app tells me is 1.56kms from home.

Waiting at the station? Pleasant enough on a cold, bright morning, and time passed chatting with a local gent walking his dog. A cup of coffee while I waited would have been welcome; I lucked on the company and I could have done with the loo. My friend was telling me how useful a loo would be; not uncommon to find human excrement on the path and in the bushes down there to the side of the tail of the council's road. He would love to carry on his walk past that road tail into Foundry Close and was telling me how people did that while the fence that blocks one area of public road from the other was out through storm damage.

Train (to Swindon) reasonable busy, no ticket check - veritable flood of people by the time we got to Swindon. Loo used at Swindon; £4.30 for a rushed coffee was something I skipped, as the London train wasn't a long wait. Loo was used. Hoped for a coffee on the train, but the catering trolley - one for a nine carriage train - did not appear. Seat felt broken - very uncomfortable. Tickets not checked either, in fact no staff seen, and we arrived on time into Platform 1 at Paddington, no ticket check their either.

Paddington onwards to Victoria - I knew I could take the No. 36 bus or the "Circle Line" and I opted for the Circle Line - turn out the circle was "broken" but London Transport is such a network that train described as "District" and headed for Barking via Victoria turned up in a couple of minutes and got me there. A good example of an obvious alternative provided when things aren't running the usual timetable.


I'm skipping over London experiences during the day - keeping this thread / story to a Melksham-centric analysis.

Homeward from City station (near St Pauls, the Old Bailey, Smithfield and Barts) where I travelled through and around between home and Uni for four years in the early 70s. In those days it was an upper level terminus station "Holborn Viaduct" but now it is a low level through Station and the "City" name is right, between and beside the city itself, and in the quieter area before Westminster and the West End.

In theory ... 15:45 at City Thameslink, change at Farrington, Paddington and Swindon, 17:59 arrival at Melksham Station, home with a walk from the station by 18:30 was the plan; on a Saturday, the final bus of the day from anywhere near the station to our home is at 17:25; there are other not far from home, but it's easier to walk the whole way. Anyway - that was the theory. Plan A

15:52 train from City ... but it failed to stop at Farringdon (looks like the station or platform was closed) so carried on to St Pancras. Fair enough - but it's a LONG walk there to the slower Hammersmith and City line platform for Paddington which - when I got there - was also closed off with staff milling around turning away wannabe customers. Plan B

OK - plans A and B had failed - Plan C would have been the 205 bus. Except Transport for London withdrew that from Paddington last year, and I really didn't want to take two buses (205 to Harley Street and a change there) so I opened for Plan D. Victoria line to Oxford Circus, to change onto Bakerloo line to Paddington. Gonna be tight for the 16:32 off Paddington ... but, ah announcement in the tube "Severe Delays on the Bakerloo Line due to a signalling failure" and I switched

Plan E - Oxford Circus to Lancaster Gate on the Central line, short walk up to Paddington - and that got me to Lancaster Gate ... and which point I gave up on that plan as I'm no longer in sprinting condition to try for the 16:32 off Paddington - added to which my phone was alerting me to GWR reliability issues - "delays between Swindon and Bristol" it said; a pleasant afternoon to sit and relax for a few minutes in Kensington Gardens, and to regroup.

After the 16:32, the next train with a connection to Melksham is the 18:48. Looking online, the 16:32 would have made me very nervous - a person had been hit by a train, the 17:35 local train from Swindon only started from Chippenham. Good operational call in that local train waited and Chippenham for the connection, though it certainly wasn't obvious to me (not that I was there) that this would happen.

I walked up to Paddington to try my luck to get through the disruption. The 17:00 Bristol train was there, loaded, but as it was already a couple of minutes after 5 it was going to be late out. I think this is Plan F. The customer support person was checking all late arrivals on the barrier and initially denied me access - "this train does not call at Melksham" - but allowed me though when I asked if it went to Bath and I would change there. Due into Bath at 18:19, good time to walk to the bus station of the 18:45 to Melksham Town Centre - home for 19:45 versus 20:35 on the train into Melksham.

We left Paddington 13 minutes late "awaiting Driver". We sat at Reading for 10 minutes "awaiting Train Manager". We took 3 minutes at Swindon while a wheelchair ramp was deployed for a passenger joining. We sat for over 6 minutes at Chippenham - the train manager explained (but hard to hear) there were issues on the platform and no platform staff available to help him. And we pulled into Bath Spa just after 18:43. No ticket checks, no coming through to offer customer support - we chatted amongst ourselves, shared what we knew, as we went along.

OK - I know Bath. The train spewed out a whole load of humanity, a mixture of parties out for the evening already oiled up ready, and tired travellers with their baggage. I passed, quickly, to and through the back / level access barrier to avoid the main staircase or lift crush and delays from them, past the back of the station and though the undercroft to the pedestrian crossing where buses leave the bus station. And there sat, having already pulled away from the stand, the 18:45 bus. I gesture to the driver "may I join" and he (rightly, it must be said) gestured back "no". It's repeated incidents like this that have asking - again - why the 273 can't stop in Manvers Street directly opposite the railway station?

And so - a wait in Bath Bus Station. Plan G. The display screens there are segmented by bays, and the lower number bay display is switched off or failed - has been for weeks. 271, 272 and 273 - Bath to Melksham and Devizes all leave from Bay 5, and the timetable there does include up to day times. They are listed separately, so you go though three lists if you're looking for a common destination. A "next buses from this stand" like they have on Dorchester Street would do wonders. But then, it does say "some buses may leave from other stands" and so it proved with the next bus - the 19:15 - which left from Stand 4. Close enough for no-one to miss it, but a screen at the start with "next bus" including those which were running from different stands would help.

Single decker, 38 seats including the tip-ups in the wheelchair bay. All taken and more people joined the bus at the following stops. There were 47 people on that bus as it left Bath and only a couple got off along the way - Standing all the way to Victoria Motors, a few minute from Melksham Station - passed at about 19:57, which is 10 minutes before the following connection off London (arrived 20:07) got there. This 273 got me to the Town Centre rather than home - picked our tea and into the house at - I estimate - around 20:15.




Conclusion - there is so much that could be done so easily; systems will never be perfect and on days like yesterday where a person was hit by a train at Royal Wootton Bassett, delays and lack of information are understood, everyone does there best and is pragmatic about it, and the other issues are dwarfed into being overlooked. And yet - GWR offering higher fares that most people need to pay, people being turned away from trains when the baboon on the gate-line didn't actually know where Melksham was, and longer term joined up thinking (like buses that actually call for the station, more combines tickets like my travelard, and where they are infrequent at least have them connect could make such a big difference. With that one exception, the staff I saw were doing a professional job but there were too few to do a complete job of customer service. But on the other hand, systems were packed so as organisations looking to get the best financial return, is there any point in encouraging more use by addressing the issues - including helping people get the most appropriate ticket for their journey, and not the one that levers the most income for the industry.

Here in Melksham, information - about cost and opportunities, connections and comfort, frequency and reliability are key - just as they are elsewhere. They cannot be fixed entirely by just Information - "Information at the Station" and with a volunteer helping to share experience and guide nervous newcomers - but the can be hugely improved.

How GWR choose to see our bid will be interesting - whether they put the priority on customer help and information and what we can provide, or whether they see it as something that will boost ridership but will help customers though knowledge find the most appropriate fares rather than buying the headline ones. The concerns do spread in other ways to buses too - complaint on Thursday evening at MTUG that it now costs £12 to make a return but journey to the RUH ... and that simply because people don't know about the Avon Rider ticket at £7. Again - if the buses are rammed, why bother?

 
Links in this page:
I was there - 28 Feb 2020 - a personal reminder
Major developments east of Melksham
Information at the Station - Community update
Pilning Station - Past, Present, Future
Smaller Station issues - Melksham and Dilton Marsh
The beauty of Wiltshire
My Radio Interview - rail in West Wiltshire
Melksham Town Council - proposed budget and precept for 2026/27
Renamed Facebook page - here's why
(Back to top of page)
Some other pages on this site:

Graham Ellis - blog and • blog index
Graham Ellis - background and • views
Philosophies of working as a town councillor
The Role of the Town Council and Councillors
How YOU can help and • Contact me
Links to other web sites and • pictures
Published Sunday, 15th March 2026

I was there - 28 Feb 2020 - a personal reminder

Six years ago today, Greta Thunberg spoke in Bristol warned us of climate change and we were headed for irrepairable change. Six years later, and we are now past the point where we can prevent that change and we now need to put far more into "Plan B" which is adapting our world to those changes. In addition with carrying on with Plan A, to at least control and mitigate the climate and other change. And we need "Plan C" to actually put some of the issues into reverse.

We used to hear so much about "Peak Oil" where we looked at the planet running out of oil resources ... how times have changed.

It's not just running out of resources. It's not just climate change. It's a whole raft of factors, often interacting, that are changing life on earth. After a conversation yesterday, lead into by public transport issues to Barnstaple, Okehampton, Looe and Exmouth all within the last few weeks, I turned up an article - now over two years old - highlighting (the) nine factors which together can give a measure of how we are doing, and indicate a safe operating space. See article

I was there in Bristol on 28th February 2020. It was just one of those days / events at which the warning bells were sounded, and by just one of the people sounding those bells. But personally it did encourage me to thinking and asking more - to look after resources, to reduce footprint, to tap renewable resources, and to help encourage others to do the same too.









 

Published Saturday, 28th February 2026

Major developments east of Melksham


Gleeson Land is bringing forward proposals for a landscape-led new development on land east of Melksham. See https://www.blackmorefarmconsultation.co.uk/

They say "The outline planning application will deliver up to 275 new homes including 30% affordable housing and extensive areas of public open green space. The proposals have been designed to incorporate a significant amount of green landscaping, comprising approximately 70% of the site. With excellent connectivity and easy access to existing facilities in Melksham, the proposals would provide a natural and sustainable extension to the town and deliver significant benefits to both the new and existing community."

I have taken the map with the application and I'm looking to put this application into context. My interpretation, but I have added red, green and blue pushpins for the other three development plans in the immediate area. Blue - Snarleton Farm. Red - Lidl. Green - land north of Sandridge Road. What I don't see is any reserved land / path here for a potential bypass

 


Published Wednesday, 25th February 2026

Information at the Station - Community update

* Melksham has some good public transport, but it's not always easy to find out what's where.

* The railway station and many bus stops are unmanned, and not exactly friendly places

* Melksham has a wonderful community of people who love to help, to socialise, and to welcome people to the town.

Let's put all three together ... "Information at the Station" is the Melksham Transport User Group's (MTUG) project to open the building just across from the station for information, a loo, friendly voices of volunteers, warmth, a bit of help and perhaps a cup of coffee.

Wiltshire Council bought the building to support rail travel way back in 2009. Soon after Covid struck, a cafe was opened there but the timing was all wrong; when that closed in 2023, I asked about taking the building on but was told "too soon". In 2024 it was written into the Neighbourhood Plan, and in 2025 that was passed at referendum and now has some legal weight in planning law, fitting under Wiltshire's local plan. And so, in January 2026 we at MTUG took up a 4 week window of opportunity to apply to GWR for "Customer and Community Infrastructure" Funding - result of the application to be announced at the end of March or early April.

The plan is to open for the (school) summer holidays, and then be open daily when trains (or rail replacement buses) are running - at the time of day that most people travelling by train are around. Run by volunteers - several people at the same time - and with free WiFi, hot drinks, etc there. A helpful hand when needed, a social meet, a hot-desk, a break from home for volunteers.

The prospectus / application for CCIF funding is available for you to read via the MTUG web site and in there you'll find lots of detail about funding and operation, and the challenges the team know they'll face and just how we'll achieve it. That was written a couple of weeks ago, and we moved on a little at last Thursday’s MTUG committee (12.2.2026) meeting; it may be opportune for us to share the warm space with the SEND drivers, for example.

Can you help? Would you like to be involved? The MTUG public meeting (our AGM) will take place at the Melksham Campus at 18:30 on Thursday, 12th March 2026. We'll cover much more than just "Information at the Station". All are welcome.

* Please get in touch with me before the AGM if you would like to help with the set up and admin tasks - these are always the roles that voluntary groups find hardest to fill.

* Please come along if you can on 12th March. We'll have other updates too, and you can help us set up for the future. We're very much a community group as well as being the official station adopters, so you can join straight in

* Please follow the MTUG page on Facebook, watch our web site and other social media, and the Melksham News too (thank you Joe, Ian, Laura and rest of the team) for when there's a newsworthy update

And finally

* Please contact me if you would like updates over coming weeks, letting me know your interest and email address. I have an informal list that I'm using just until we get this and linked MTUG projects off the ground this summer. Usual GSPR / ICO rules apply - just for MTUG use, and I can remove your name on request at any time.

Link - - full prospectus, 2.2.2026

 

Published Wednesday, 18th February 2026

Pilning Station - Past, Present, Future

-
Mark, Tony, Richard, Tim, Reuben, a gentleman who had walked from Caldicot, a gent who had cycled from Parkway stopping on the way to use “The Wave”, and I met at the station to catch the 15:32 train from Pilning on Saturday. Quite a gathering on the platform, and 2 people got off too.

Old history

Pilning is one of the most unusual stations operated by GWR. The railway line there was initially (station opened 1863) the line to New Passage, from where the ferry left for South Wales. When the Severn Tunnel was opened, the new line branched off (or rather became the main line) and the line to New Passage was no more - that was in 1886. In 1928, the old trackbed almost to New Passage was re-opened with the line turning left just before New Passage and running to Severn Beach, where the line had arrived in 1922 (excursions) and 1924 (public service). That late addition was lost to passengers in 1964 - after just 36 years of service.

As well as it's complex history, Pilning is unusual for other reasons. It was the start (or end) station for earliest motorail services - offering car carrying by train through the tunnel under the Severn to Severn Tunnel Junction prior to the opening of the first Severn Bridge. There were also ferries that would take cars, but the car by train service persisted in a very limited way. Pilning was also - and as I understand it remains - an emergency evacuation station from the Severn Tunnel.

In old GWR terms, "Pilning" would have been called "Pilning Road". It's around a 2 kms walk from the village centre to the platform gate, out of Pilning Village, past a straggle of houses, a school and a new church build on the disused Severn Beach line, past the station to double back up a driveway to the station which approaches it in the "wrong" direction from Pilning. Little wonder that passenger numbers over the years shrank, and the train service shrank, and of course that meant that passenger numbers shrank further and the train service shrank further. By the early 2010s, there was just one service each way per week - on Saturdays.

Recent History

Pilning Station is on the main London to Cardiff line, and that line was to electrified. A very sensible thing to do. But Pilning Station presented a problem. The platform that trains from South Wales call at is level access off the car park / yard, but the platform that trains called at as they were headed into the tunnel and Wales was only accessible via a footbridge, built long before there was any thought of electrification and with modern (this was 2016) standards needed replacing / rebuilding higher, and for level access needed long slopes as you have at Ashchurch, or lifts as have been added at the next station along at Patchway.

So - what happened? There was no economic case made to replace the footbridge, no economic case made to close the station (an expensive procedure) and no case made to remove the Severn Tunnel evacuation role such as and if it still exists. So the footbridge was removed, and in November 2016 the one train each way on Saturdays became two trains from South Wales to Bristol and none the other way. With the removal of return opportunities (and the majority of local rail trips ARE people going out and back the same day) - this blow removes one of the final vestiges of local usefulness from the station.

The Station today

Prior to yesterday, I caught the train from Pilning in April 2023, September 2024 and again in May last year 2025. Between those visits, not much changed. But for the Saturday just gone, there's a marked change. The old stones and gravel platform has been replaces and re-edged with modern concrete edging, tarmac, and a yellow line we should keep behind. The old waiting shelter has been replaced by a new one - very disappointingly on the site of the old footbridge, without (it appears) passive provision for any way to put the bridge back. All along the fencing of the platform are what I'm pretty sure are fluorescent lights, each with a little green glow to confirm that they's working. A great deal of new signage too.

The train itself is now a modern bi-mode one, pulling away from Pilning once we all piled on with impressive acceleration, and with other unexpected bonuses such as the ability to reserve a seat. There's no way to get back to Pilning, of course. Had we caught the 08:32, there's a ticketing easement that lets you get back from Bristol doubling back via South Wales, but all the notices at the station tell you are how to get to Bristol, or to Cardiff, and no help about how to get home again if you live in Pilning.

-


Local use of the station

Truth be told, Pilning has rather turned its back on its station. And who can blame them? Many years of campaigning for a useable service and they have kept seeing steps in the reverse direction. An hourly bus runs through the village from Severn Beach and carries on to Bristol Parkway Station, taking 40 minutes for a journey that takes 18 minutes by car and for drivers goes when the driver wants it, right from their own driveway. Driving to Bristol (Temple Meads) takes half an hour ... by public transport, an hour and a quarter is the fastest - or 19 minutes on the train next Saturday. Not much good for work, college, or a night out bearing in mind the only train back is at 14:32, change at Severn Tunnel Junction and taking 59 minutes.

The estimated population of Pilning is 1500, plus perhaps another few hundred in Redwick and New Passage giving a station "catchment" of perhaps 2,000 - except it's not a catchment - the station is "Pilning Road" and there's no more than a hundred residents within 1km.

The station is a long walk from the village and not welcoming when you get there:
-


National - what the future might bring

Our Government said when elected "Our plan will include introducing mandatory planning targets to aim to deliver on our ambition to build 1.5 million new homes over the next five years" and they have thus far stuck with their ambitious target. That's around 2,500 per constituency but realistically and practically it can't and won't be spread evenly. Houses need to go in areas that people want to live in, and in places near enough to business hubs and with existing facilities such as transportation - rail and road - that can be beefed up. It strikes me that Pilning has many things going for it, whereas Plockton (for example) does not. We are already seeing advancing plans for additional local trains on the Cardiff - Bristol line with additional stations - curiously all on the Welsh side. A new Station just into England from the Severn Tunnel - let's call it "Severnside", and a new station for Aztec West (and with a nice walkway to Cribbs Causeway)

So what may the future be for Pilning

How do these development thought fit with Pilning? Whilst the fields around the current station look sorely tempting for houses, the problem of how to access the westbound platform - especially with the recent "uncaring" changes - remains. A second approach slope up on the far side and a second station entrance (as is done for disabled travellers at Bradford-on-Avon) is impractical because of the active loop line on that side. I suppose a new outer platform could be built there. But there may be a better alternative to provide a resited station on the Cross Hands Road B4055.

"Severnside" station would actually be on edge of Pilning village - so a really good commuting station with the two-train-an-hour (not two-trains-a-week) that Transport for Wales are suggesting, and it would be just across from the Severnside business area which now comes right up to the field next to the railway, and at that bridge. With a bridge already "in situ", slopes down to platforms on the outer lines would mean that the issues from Pilning Road are solved.

Property value increases when there's a station with a credible train service offered, and if I were a Pilning Villager, I would give some of these plans a cautious welcome. I would want to protect the road through the centre of my village, perhaps with a connection from the M49 that you see on the map to the B4055. There is already a junction there with slip roads, roundabout, etc, for the business parks. And the station would be then an enabler for planned residential growth - not around the current station as a bubble of houses, but outward from the new station to be an integral part of the community of Pilning for the future.

-


Opinion

A handful of people have fought over the years to retain Pilning station, as a latent opportunity. Within the residents of the parish there have been calls for much better services, but at the exclusion of development opportunities which would fund and support that service.

My personal view is that a resited station, served by local trains from Cardiff to Bristol and situated on the boundary of village / parish would provide extra mobility, reduced journey times and congestion, bolster business and help controlled and supportive business growth, and would raise the affluence and values locally, including those of existing owners.

Were I a resident, I too would be concerned as to what might be going on or about to go in my “back yard”, and I would be rather more inclined to explain and support it to my fellow residents, rather than putting on a frosty and unresponsive exterior. There would be a danger, I fear, that is I buried my head in the sand, I would look up in five years and discover so many things had been done – and not very sympathetically – because I had failed to engage and encourage.




* Where a station building once offered shelter from the rain, it no longer does
* Where once there was a footbridge to access trains to Wales, it has gone
* Where once there was a scheduled bus service, it has gone (sign remains!)
* Where once cars were loaded onto trains to go through the tunnel, gone as well
-

-


First picture - A class 33 diesel locomotive passes through Pilning railway station in Gloucestershire in 1986 Creative Commons 2.0 License by BoxBrownie3
Other photographs - licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 by Graham Ellis

 

Published Monday, 9th February 2026

Smaller Station issues - Melksham and Dilton Marsh

-

There are two railway stations in Wiltshire where the limited facilities and infrequent services give lie to the fact that they serve substantial catchments. Those stations are Melksham, where the population of the urban area it serves is 25,000, and Dilton Marsh where the population it serves in 9,000. Both stations have residential expansion planned locally; Wiltshire is one of the fastest growing authority areas in the UK, and sustainable and efficient transport is at the hub of that.

Those stations:
Dilton Marsh: 10119 journeys in 2001/02 rising to 21580 journeys in 2024/25 (2.4 journeys per resident)
Melksham: 3266 journeys in 2001/02 to 60932 journeys in 2024/25 (2.4)

By comparison:
Warminster: 247665 journeys in 2001/02 to 355958 journeys in 2025/25 (14.2)
Bradford-on-Avon: journeys 211968 in 2001/02 to 532220 journeys in 2024/25 (53.2)
Trowbridge: 404998 journeys in 2001/01 to 904342 journeys in 2024/25 (24.4)

I have left out Westbury and Avoncliff from this analysis - they are special cases. Westbury is a major junction serving multiple lines and interchanges in addition to the local catchment, and also, unique is West Wiltshire, has a regular express service to and from London. Avoncliff has a very small resident catchment, but a substantial leisure traffic which makes comparisons there difficult and would give misleading figures.

Train travel is "mass transit", and of the 1.875 million tickets sold to the five stations considered, 1.793 million are sold for journeys to or from the big 3. That's 95.6% of journeys. But - hang on - that's only serving 67.9% of the urban catchment populations it should be serving.

How much traffic is being lost by the poor services at Dilton Marsh and Melksham? Let's take the Warminster figure of 14.2 journeys per resident per annum. We would predict 127800 ticket sales for Dilton Marsh - a rise of 106000, or 592% of current journeys. And we would predict 355000 ticket sales for Melksham, or 583% of current journeys.

Outrageous predictions like these have me questioning my own sanity. However, discussions with retired specialist civil servants I have worked with over the years, my sanity isconfirmed. These are the sort of numbers they would expect after a lead in time of 3 to 5 years of a relaible, friendly, appropriate, usable service. Which leads us to ask two quetions - "why has it not been done" and "what is the negative economic effect of the poorly served areas caused by the lack of decent trains".



Why has this [appropriate service at Melksham and Dilton Marsh] not been provided

Perhaps reasons include:

1. It is more profitable to service the big stations than the smaller ones

2. It takes time to build up traffic - but franchises were short and management of the railway tran operators is now on an annual business plan

3. The railway network struggles to cope with all the trains needed, and so only the few get the right services - those, perhaps, where people are making longer and more lucrative journeys

4. The specifiers of the services don't have full data / reaslise about the population around the little stations

5. There is no adequate mechanism through which economic benefits can be used to help subsidise trin services which bring them if those services are not immediatly profitable.

6. Train operators are judged by achieved by running trains on time, and by having timetables as "sharp" as possible. So it's a benefit to them to remove awkward trains from the timetable, even if it leaves people stranded.


Negative impact - this is what is missed by a none-working station like Melksham or Dilton Marsh

Key Economic Benefits of Rail Stations:

* Property Value Appreciation: Investment in rail stations, particularly through improvements or new builds, can increase property values in the immediate vicinity by 30% or more.

* Local Economic Growth & High Streets: Stations generate approximately £98 billion annually for local economies in Britain, with 4 in 5 passengers supporting local businesses and high streets.

* Regeneration & Development: They act as catalysts for urban renewal, unlocking potential for housing, office spaces, and retail development around the station area.

* Employment & Productivity: Stations directly employ thousands of staff, and by enhancing connectivity, they increase productivity in cities and towns, connecting workers to jobs.

* Improved Connectivity: They reduce transport costs and travel times compared to road, enhancing economic competitiveness.


What can we do locally to help inform / work for service improvements fit for the towns?

64000 dollar question. We have a West Wiltshire Rail User Group committee meeting on Wednesday where we will be looking "next steps" - including but not limited to the sudden hole in the evening service at Dilton Marsh "in order to make timekeeping of the busier Portsmouth to Cardiff train better" ... We are wary of having other gems sprung on us and GWR have broken a bond of trust and partnership by not discussing the change in advance and not taking proper steps to put things right straight away! We will however work with them and their successors to see what we can do. But passengers are pretty toothless and we are limited, have often to accept what we are given and make the best of it
.
 


Published Monday, 2nd February 2026

The beauty of Wiltshire






 

Published Sunday, 18th January 2026

My Radio Interview - rail in West Wiltshire

I did a rail interview for West Wilts Radio on 13th January 2026. A wonderful opportunity, over some 20 minutes, introduce the listeners to:
   * what has been achieved,
   * where challenges remain,
   * why some things are as they are, and
   * to look forward for a year and perhaps for a decade.
And a chance to answer some of those questions that you may have wondered about, or never thought to ask. Listen again at https://grahamellis.uk/wwrug_wwradio_20260113.m4a

The map at the head of this post comes from the Wiltshire Rail Strategic Study. I have shaded the area covered by the West Wiltshire Rail User Group. In yellow, you have the three West Wiltshire stations in the Melksham and Devizes parliamentary constituancy. In blue, the four West Wiltshire stations in the South West Wiltshire constituency.

Although formed and constituted to the area of the old West Wiltshire District Council, the West Wiltshire Rail User Group also takes a user group interest in Frome, just across the county line in Somerset. Most passenger train journeys to and from Frome are to or through West Wiltshire, and it is logical for us all to work closely together. The User Group is also starting to take an interest in Devizes Gateway - it's in the same constituency as Melksham and Bradford-on-Avon though on a different line and outside the boundary of the old district council. And of course as it's just a projected station, there are no users for WWRUG to represent yet.

 

Published Thursday, 15th January 2026

Melksham Town Council - proposed budget and precept for 2026/27

Next Monday (12th January 2026), Melksham Town Council sets its 2026/27 budget, with a proposed precept increase of 30% for the year from April 2026 to March 2027. That would raise the annual charge on a Band D (mid range) property from £199.92 to £259.74. Full agenda pack ((here)).

A lot of work has clearly gone into the detail of next year's budget which results in that increase. Although it's very late in the day, the way is open for any of the electorate to express their views to their councillors with a view to letting the councillors know how they would like them to vote / whether they would like to suggest any changes. The way is also open for the electorate to speak briefly at the start of the meeting - 19:00 in the Town Hall, to ask questions on the proposals including those that might influence the vote and any amendments. If you have a substantive issue / question, it would be a good idea to let the CEO know in the next couple of days so that she can have data available at the meeting to address the question prior to the budget vote.

At this time last year, I was a councillor and felt that the £199.92 precept was too low and would leave the council in the current year in a tight financial situation, perhaps having to bite uncomfortably into reserves. My proposal to raise the amount to - as I recall - £219.00 took my fellow councillors by surprise and in a narrow vote was only just defeated. I noted that senior councillors supported my proposal. So this year, there is a "triple-whammie" - with an increase needed:
  • to keep track of rising prices, iced with ever more complex legal and employment issues which are far above headline inflation rates.
  • to make up the increase that did not happen last year and be ready for a similar spend in the coming year
  • to rebuild reserves which were described to me as "dangerously low" if any crisis should crop up even before they are being eaten into this current year.

It is natural at the first opportunity a council has for it to make a substative increase to implement its program, and that's also a number of years before the electorate gets a vote for councillors, by which time big increases are forgotten!

I am supportive, in principle, of the increase. Melksham's £200 was below Devizes's £220, Bradford-on-Avon's £298, Chippenham's £321, Calne's £360, and Trowbridge's £294, and I would expect it to be very much at the lower end of other local towns next year too even with the 30% rise. Which is not to say that great vigilance is still required to help ensure that the taxpayer gets value for money. There are some areas where a relatively small extra one-off spend will result in a saving into the future year after year after year.
  • I look to things like the out-of-town depot hired by the amenities team when they could be based in town at the building acquired last year.
  • I look to things like information systems which with a quick, easy, central and populated events system. The investment in setting up the system has already been made - it went live last May, but as I write it says "No upcoming events found" - a waste of money in getting the system put in if it's not to be populated.
  • And there are elements of the informational web site where 90% of the work has been done and the final 10% is needed to make it a useful reference source which, in time, should be widely uses and save an awful lot of repeated questions being asked.

So - I hope the precept passes; a failure / much lower figure would just store up the hurt for next year, and/or fail to provide the tools that our staff need to do their jobs. Failure to provide an appropriate working environment for staff is, perhaps, one of the reasons our turnover is so high - and a high staff turnover leads to higher expenses for recruitment, training, and for newcomers getting up to speed.

The Precept is collected through the year by Wiltshire Council who pass on the monies to the Town Council. Other payments such as the Wiltshire Council and police and fire and rescue service charges are collected at the same time

The map accompanying this article shows the Melksham Town area to which this precept would apply. A different precept will be set for Melksham Without, which includes Bowerhill, Berryfield, Beanacre, Shaw and Whitley.

 


Published Wednesday, 7th January 2026

Renamed Facebook page - here's why

Formerly "Graham Ellis, Melksham, Independent", I have changed the name of my Melksham Facebook page ready for 2026 to "Graham Ellis, a Melksham view" as that better reflects the present and future, rather than the past when I was the independent (unaffiliated) elected member of the Town Council.

I continue to take a loving interest in Melksham, and to voluntarily offer to help where my background and abilities may be useful, effective and appreciated. On the travel, transport and planning side I continue to keep very much of an active mind, and I may be worth listening to. But on many other issues I have passed the active baton on.

For 2026, I am already looking excitedly ahead to learning so much, to advocating for sustainable transport and managed growth in Melksham, and information systems that go with that sustainable transport to make it friendly and easily accessible.

There is so much to say and do. In the early part of December, I organised the distribution of Melksham Public Transport timetables for this winter - a huge success and I learned so much from talking to people - I have written up 35 things I learned or had confirmed. A friend who overviewed my notes reminded me that "less is more" and I must not expect people to actually read the whole lot, and I don't. What it does do is give me a reminder of what the residents want to see, what troubles them, where things are working and where not. And that gives me a wonderful insight and to know what to encourage and what to explain and to whom in 2026.

Illustration - sitting down over a cup of coffee (at the Lowden Garden Centre) with Lisa, my rock and support, in the background. Happy to chat over a coffee, happy to explain, happy to learn too.

 



Published Tuesday, 30th December 2025
-

Thank you for voting Graham Ellis onto Melksham Town Council

Jump to top of page